What generative theory and OT have in common is that the empirical observations about properties of synchronic states in the languages of the world are directly inserted (sometimes in a simplified form) into the innate apparatus of Universal Grammar, without any attempt being made to formulate them in such a way as to explain their existence. To say that a constraint is universal and innate is to isolate it from possible explanation on the basis of factors outside of language, and, indeed, to preclude the need for further explanation. Even those versions of OT that appeal to phonetic or functional explanations for constraints fail to provide the crucial diachronic link between the functional factor and the existing synchronic state.
cit.
Bybee 2006, chapter 8: Language change and universals, in Marial and Gil eds. Linguistic Universals, Cambridge University Press.
'Linguistics > Bybee' 카테고리의 다른 글
3 things affecting on the productivity of a linguistic pattern (0) | 2012.07.26 |
---|---|
공시적 유형론이 결여하게 되는 설명력의 예 (0) | 2009.03.23 |
세대간 언어차가 언어변화를 일으킬까 (0) | 2008.12.17 |
산출 (표면) 지향 스키마와 영어의 모음 굴절 과거 시제 표현 (0) | 2008.12.02 |
바이비(Bybee)의 네트워크 모델(Network model)에서 단어의 표상과 형태소 (0) | 2008.11.09 |